Thursday, December 3, 2015

FDA Hosts Workshop on Medical Device Cybersecurity in 2016


I'm pleased to announce that FDA will be holding its 2nd workshop on Collaborative Approaches to Medical Device Cybersecurity on January 20-21, 2016 at FDA's White Oak headquarters. This public workshop will bring together the stakeholders who have been communicating over the last couple years to find collaborative ways to improve rather than whine about medical device security.

On everyone's minds is the anticipated FDA guidance document on post-market cybersecurity as well as the AAMI guidance document on medical device security that many of us have been toiling over for multiple years to help medical device engineers incorporate cybersecurity best practices into the early requirements engineering, design, and implementation of medical devices.

For others in the cyberphysical systems space, one might come a day early because the National Highway Traffic Safety Agency will be holding a suspiciously similarly sounding Vehicle Cybersecurity Roundtable on January 19, 2016!

All these interesting workshops will be leading up to the 4th Annual Archimedes Workshop on Medical Device Security in May 16-17, 2016 in Ann Arbor, MI.

See you there!

Tuesday, September 29, 2015

Medical Device Security Report at the National Academy of Engineering FOE

Prof. Fu speaking with fellow engineers at the NAE Beckman Center.
Here you can find my newly released report "On The Technical Debt of Medical Device Security" from the National Academy of Engineering web site.

Earlier this month, I spoke about medical device security at the annual "Frontiers of Engineering" event held by the National Academy of Engineering. All the talks were captivating and intellectually stimulating, including topics such as the James Webb Space Telescope, nanostructured metamaterials, and forecasting natural disasters.

One of the more memorable talks was by Jeremy Banik of the Air Force Research Laboratory who demonstrated a high strain composite mechanism by unrolling an innocent looking 1 ft long Carbon Storable Tubular Extendible Member into a sturdy 20+ ft pole. The pole automatically unfurls and makes a rather loud snap as it zips itself up. It's designed for deployment in space where payloads that fit the geometry of a rocket must expand to carry out large-diameter space missions. The audience asked if TSA had ever tried opening the roll, and the answer is no, but it would be tubular, dude.
Carbon Storable Tubular Extendible Member. Photo from Jeremy Banik.

Monday, September 14, 2015

A Musical Interlude to Medical Device Security

We at Archimedes have been busy running security engineering tutorials at medical device manufacturers and hospitals over the past several months, so we have not had the opportunity to post new material lately. We are also in the middle of scheduling various seminars on medical device security at hospitals as part of October's National Cybersecurity Awareness month.

In the meantime...to brighten your day, here is a music video co-authored by yours truly about the woes of compilers, gdb, and autograders for programming homework to the tune of Taylor Swift's "Shake It Off."


Saturday, July 25, 2015

When Will a Medical Device Endure a Cybersecurity Recall?

Cybersecurity for the Internet of Things: A house of cars?
For years, I was wondering which would happen first: a medical device cybersecurity recall or an automotive cybersecurity recall. We now have the answer. By now you must have heard that Fiat Chrysler has earned the honor of the first cybersecurity automotive recall of 1.4 million vehicles.

Issuing a recall is no light matter because there are subtle risk-benefit implications. For instance, a sudden recall on a medical device could have profound risks that outweigh the benefits of a blanket recall. In a non-cybersecurity context, this debate arose not long ago when a defibrillator lead suffered a mechanical design flaw. Because removal of an electrode could pose risks to a patient when the tip had already bound to the cardiac tissue, only certain patients were recommended to replace the electrode. So whereas today automobiles have been recalled for cybersecurity reasons, there will need to be a different debate when eventually some medical device will suffer a clinically relevant cybersecurity flaw. If the flawed device is not implanted and other competing devices are available, then a recall may make sense in the risk-benefit calculus as patients can use another device (e.g., an infusion pump or bedside monitor). On the other hand, blanket recalls are likely not the answer for an implanted device where there are fewer alternatives available for patients already with certain predisposed risks.

The medical device community should consider itself lucky that the automotive community has earned the dubious honor of having the first cybersecurity-only recall. Given the large number of medical devices, it's just a matter of time before some medical device company will receive a painful, late night phone call to confront challenges similar to what Fiat Chrysler is now enduring.

Monday, March 23, 2015

How I Met Your Founder: Kevin Fu Meets Earl Bakken of Medtronic


Earl Bakken and Kevin Fu discussing
blended medicine, January 2015
I recently had the pleasure of speaking about medical device security at the University of Hawaii at Manoa, touring the unique patient facilities of the North Hawaii Community Hospital, and meeting with Earl Bakken at his home on the Big Island. Earl co-founded Medtronic and is most widely known for inventing the first external, battery-operated, transistorized, wearable artificial pacemaker in 1957. At 91-years-young, Earl continues to keep a busy schedule!

I have to admit, nine years ago I would not have predicted that I'd be having a private lunch conversation about blended medicine with Earl in his home. Back in 2006, I became intensively preoccupied with understanding and improving the security and privacy of implantable medical devices. It took a couple years, but after a rejection, one of our first papers on medical device security was eventually published at the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy in 2008. Needless to say, there was initially some mutual mistrust between various parties. Here's this academic from the ivory tower warning of security problems from the future! It's only natural to be suspicious.

Fast forward to 2015, and you'll find that many major medical device manufacturers understand the importance of cybersecurity, but are still working on their solutions under the spirit of NIST and AAMI security and risk frameworks. There are growing pains. That's why each May, top engineers from the medical device industry and healthcare providers descend on Ann Arbor for interdisciplinary group problem solving at the Archimedes Workshop on Medical Device Security.

I've got quite the tome of notes from my discussion with Earl, so I'll be updating this blog entry with stories as I get a break from teaching a large undergraduate class this semester. Stay tuned for the next photo and story!

North Hawaii Community Hospital



The radiologists hang loose at North Hawaii Community Hospital,
and have a funny sense of humor.